Foamable composition

ABSTRACT

A fast curing foamable composition useful for the production of fabric-like materials comprises a resin or latex formulation and a mixture of a highly ethoxylated alkylphenol, an alkali metal N-alkyl sulfosuccinamate and an alkali metal alkyl sulfate.

This application is a division of Ser. No. 243,083, filed on Mar. 12,1981, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,325,831.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Fabric-like material produced with resin or latex foam compositions arewell known and many are commercially available. In some instances theyhave a flocked surface but often they do not. A particularly suitableflocked foamed latex sheet is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,646,issued on Nov. 1, 1977 to P. M. Westfall and H. Mayfield, wherein isdescribed the procedures for producing pliable, soft, foamed latexsheets of good hand and breathability having many uses. However, it hassince been discovered that the procedures and compositions discussed inthis patent often require a commercially unacceptable period of time forcuring of the latex formulation thus detracting somewhat from commercialacceptance for many applications. The instant invention has resolvedthis problem to a significant extent by the selection of specificfoamable mixtures added at critical concentrations to the resin or latexformulation.

Though the use of foamable compositions is known, none heretoforeemployed have achieved the successes herein attained. In U.S. Pat. No.3,577,554 issued on May 4, 1971 to D. B. Parrish et al. there aredescribed formulations of carboxyl-containing copolymer latexes reactedwith an aziridine to obtain a polymer latex having both aminoester andcarboxyl groups. The pH of this polymer latex is then adjusted togreater than 7, it is foamed, applied as a foam and cured to dry andform a frothed sheet. An important aspect of this process is therequirement of a basic pH value.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,491,033 issued on Jan. 20, 1970 to E. R. Dunn teachesthe conversion of a foam to a solid cellular material without gellingthe wet foam by use of a mixture of foaming agents and mentions thatdi-sodium N-octadecyl sulfosuccinamate can be used as a component of oneof the specific mixtures.

Foam coated composites are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,607,341 issuedon Sept. 21, 1971 to R. E. Goins et al., with the disclosure makingreference to the use of salts of aliphatic sulfates or alkaryl sulfatesamong the useful foaming agents or surfactants.

Synthetic rubber foams based on styrene copolymer latexes are disclosedin U.S. Pat. No. 3,215,647 issued on Nov. 2, 1965 to E. R. Dunn. Thepatentee shows the separate use of ethoxylated nonylphenols and alkalimetal salts of alkyl sulfates at acidic pH values. However, thecomposition must contain a coreactive material containing at least twosubstituent groups coreactive with the reactive groups on the latex inorder to obtain a good foam.

R. C. Nahta in U.S. Pat. No. 4,198,316 issued on Apr. 15, 1980 disclosesthe use of mixtures that can contain an alkali metal salt of an alkylsulfate as foaming agent in conjunction with at least two othercomponents, one being a "dispersant" and the other a "stabilizer." Thereference indicates the need of a basic pH value for the foamablemixture.

Nonstable foams are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,099,913 issued on July11, 1978 to A. T. Walter, G. M. Bryant and R. L. Readshaw. These foamsare produced using a variety of foaming agents, applied to a substrate,and are characterized by a short foam half-life that results in rapidbreaking of the foam on contact with the substrate.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention is concerned with rapid curing foamablecompositions comprising a resin or latex formulation and a mixture of ahigh ethoxylated alkylphenol, an alkali metal N-alkyl sulfosuccinamateand an alkali metal alkyl sulfate. The three components are added atcritical concentrations based on the parts of dry resin present in thefoamable composition and these concentrations are expressed as parts perhundred parts of resin (abbreviated as "phr"). The mode of preparationof the foamable mixture is of some importance in achieving maximumproperties and, further, the pH of the foamable formulation in order toachieve fast cure is also important.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The foamable mixture, which is the most important part of thisinvention, is a mixture of (a) a highly ethoxylated alkylphenol of theformula: ##STR1## wherein R is a saturated or unsaturated, linear orbranched alkyl group having from 7 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably from 8to 12 carbon atoms and x has an average value of from 20 to 200,preferably from 40 to 100; (b) an alkali metal N-alkyl sulfosuccinamateof the formula: ##STR2## wherein R' is a saturated or unsaturated,linear or branched alkyl group having from 16 to 24 carbon atoms,preferably from 18 to 20 carbon atoms and M is hydrogen or an alkalimetal atom with the proviso that at least one M group is an alkali metalatom; and (c) an alkali metal alkyl sulfate of the formula:

    R"OSO.sub.3 M'

wherein R" is a saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched alkyl grouphaving from 7 to 24 carbon atoms, preferably from 8 to 18 carbon atomsand M' is an alkali metal atom.

The concentration of ethoxylated alkylphenol present in the foamablecomposition is from about 2 to about 20 phr, preferably from about 2.25to about 18.5 phr and most preferably from about 6 to about 12.5 phr.The ethoxylated alkylphenols are commercially available and known tothose skilled in the art; therefore, an extensive listing thereof is notessential. Illustrative thereof one can mention the ethoxylated heptyl,octyl, 2-ethylhexyl, nonyl, decyl, isodecyl, neodecyl, dodecyl,tridecyl, hexadecyl, octadecyl, eicosyl phenols having the averagenumber of oxyethylene groups indicated above.

The concentration of the alkali metal N-alkyl sulfosuccinamate presentin the foamable composition is from about 2 to about 20 phr, preferablyfrom about 2.25 to about 17 phr and most preferably from about 5.4 toabout 14 phr. Since these compounds are well known to those skilled inthe art and commercially available, an extensive listing thereof is notrequired. Illustrative thereof one can mention the sodium and potassiumsalts in which the alkyl group can be hexadecyl, heptadecyl, octadecyl,nonadecyl, eicosyl, heneicosyl, docosyl, tricosyl or tetracosyl,including the branched alkyl groups having from 16 to 24 carbon atoms;for example, disodium N-octadecyl-sulfosuccinamate.

The concentration of the alkali metal alkyl sulfate present in thefoamable composition is from about 3 to about 40 phr, preferably fromabout 4.5 to about 32.5 phr and most preferably from about 12 to about24 phr. These sulfates are well known to those skilled in the art andmany are commercially available. Illustrative thereof one can mentionthe sodium and potassium salts wherein the alkyl group can be heptyl,octyl, 2-ethylhexyl, nonyl, isodecyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl,tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, octadecyl, nonadecyl, eicosyl,docosyl or tetracosyl, including the branched alkyl groups having from 7to 24 carbon atoms; for example, sodium or potassium 2-ethylhexylsulfate, sodium cetyl sulfate, sodium octyl sulfate, sodium oleylsulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate.

It is to be recognized that discretion is required in the total amountof the three surfactants added to the foamable compositions and thatthough ranges for each of the three are recited the use of the maximumor high amounts of each in the foamable composition would tend to have adeleterious effect on the final properties of the foamed articleproduced.

The foamable compositions contain the foamable mixture described abovewith components (a), (b) and (c) in the concentrations indicated, theresin or latex formulation and other additives. The resin and latexformulations that can be used in producing the foamable compositions areany of the commercially available latex or dispersible resincompositions, and include the acrylic latexes, nitrile latexes,styrene-butadiene latexes, vinyl acetate latexes, vinyl chloridelatexes, vinyl-acrylic latexes, ethylene-vinyl acetate-acrylic latexes,ethylene-vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate latexes or any other latexproduced from a water insoluble homopolymeric or copolymeric resin.These are well known to those skilled in the art and many arecommercially available.

Among the other additives that are present in the foamable compositionare thickeners at a concentration of from about 1 to 5 phr, preferablyabout 1 to 3 phr; other anionic or nonionic surfactants atconcentrations ranging from 0 to about 5 phr, preferably from about 1.5to 4.5 phr; crosslinkers at concentrations up to about 13 phr,preferably less than 2.5 phr; fillers at concentrations up to about 50phr; pigments and colorants to achieve the desired tinctorial effect;bactericides or fungicides or plasticizers if desired. The use of suchmaterials is known in the art and requires no further elaboration beyondthat indicated since the skilled individuals know the amunt of eachconventionally used and the types of each available.

The foamable composition is foamed using equipment readily available forfoaming compositions. This is accomplished by beating air into thecomposition, or some other gas, until a fine, uniform cell structurefoam is obtained having the desired foam cell size and body. The volumeof the foamable composition is increased to from about 3 to 20 times itsoriginal volume, preferably from 6 to 10 times its original volume. Thefoamable composition may contain fillers and colorants if desired. Ithas been noted that when these are to be employed overall better resultsare often achieved if they are given a grinding treatment with water anda portion of the alkali metal N-alkyl sulfosuccinamates before adding toother components used in the foamable composition. Thus, the proceduregenerally followed involves grinding the pigments and fillers with waterand dispersant, adding the remainder of the formulation ingredients tothe grind and thoroughly mixing until uniform. The foamable compositionis then foamed and applied to the substrate by any conventional means,for example, a knife coater. After application of the foam to thesubstrate, flocking material can be applied to the surface, if desired,and the composite is dried and cured at an ambient to elevatedtemperature. The dry composite can also be passed through crushing rollsif desired, and heated to complete curing. Crushing often improvesdurability of the foamed fabric, but it is not essential; for example,in hospital fabrics that are used once and discarded durability is notas important a factor as it is in drapery fabrics.

The foamable compositions of this invention containing the foamingmixture defined have low pH values; that is the pH of the foamablecomposition is acidic. It was completely unexpected to find that theseacidic compositions were capable of producing stable wet foams at thelow pH values and that the foams cured at an unexpectedly fast rate toproduce a dry cellular product; much faster than the cure ratesheretofore noted when using compositions having pH values above 7. Thus,it was found that our foam compositions generally dried in less than 5minutes at about 100° C. to 125° C., often in less than 2 minutes atabout 107° C., and cured in less than 5 minutes at temperatures of fromabout 135° C. to about 160° C. in the laboratory experiments. Assubstrate one can use any of the woven or non-woven materials availableproduced from natural or synthetic fibers or blends; also suitable arepaper, leather, wood, metal, plastic, glass or rubber substrates.

Several tests were utilized to evaluate each fabric, and these tests aredetailed below.

Tensile Strength

A standard Instron Tensile Tester® was employed for dry and wet strengthmeasurements. Samples were die-cut to 1 inch by 3.5 inches then heldwith 1 inch width jaws. A 2 inch gauge length was used and the crossheadspeed was 1 inch per minute. Five samples were tested in the crossdirection for each fabric for both dry and wet measurements. The wetstrength measurements were accomplished after soaking for four minutesin an aqueous solution containing 1 percent of the dioctyl ester ofsodium sulfosuccinic acid. The samples exhibited typical nonwovenstress-strain curves with a fairly high initial modulul leveling off toan irregular plateau then falling to low values at higher elongation.The approximate average of the plateau region was taken as the tensilestrength.

Abrasion Resistance

Two methods were employed to determine the abrasion resistance of thefabrics. The first was the Taber Abraser® and utilized CS-10 wheels witha 250 g weight. The samples were die-cut to 4 inch by 4 inch thenmounted on specimen cards. The samples were weighed initially and after10 cycles to give an estimate of the initial abrasion. Some samplesshowed an increase in weight after the initial 10 cycles. These valueswere reported as negative weight loss, and these occurrences wereattributed to imbedding of portions of the abrasive in the fabric asevidenced by green discoloration. Failure was seen as delamination of asection of foam with remaining flock from the substrate. If failure didnot occur, the test was terminated at 1000 cycles.

The second method utilized for determining abrasion resistance was theCrockmeter® (Test Fabrics Inc.), an instrument traditionally used forcolor fastness determination. Fabric samples were die-cut to 2.75 inchby 6 inch then weighed and mounted. The test basically consists ofrubbing a cloth under a given weight back and forth across the testfabric. The test was terminated at 1000 cycles or at failure whichconsisted of delamination of a section of foam with the addendant flockfrom the substrate. After failure or 1000 cycles, the fabric sample wasreweighed to determine the weight loss, and the percentage value wastransformed to give the loss for the actual sample area tested. Finally,some samples exhibited rolling or pilling prior to failure, and thisoccurrence was also recorded.

Some points of interest about the abrasion tests should be noted. First,the correlations between the Taber results and the Crockmeter resultswere not statistically strong, leading to the supposition that thegoodness of abrasion resistance is dependent on the method ofmeasurement. Second, the mode of failure for both tests is delaminationof the foam from the substrate which is quite different from the normalconcept of surface abrasion. Thus, the best fabrics should be thoserequiring many cycles to failure and a small weight loss representingflock and possibly upper layers of foam.

Wash Resistance

Standard home laundry washer and dryer were utilized. Fabric sampleswere cut to 8 inch by 10 inch and washed using AATCC Standard Detergent#124 with two laboratory coats for ballast. A hot water wash followed bya warm rinse and then a 50 minute standard dry cycle were employed.Fabrics failed only after washing, not after drying, and failureoccurred by flaking of the foam structure off of the substrate.

Stiffness

The ASTM D 1388-55T method for evaluating the stiffness of the fabricswas employed.

Porosity

Measurement of fabric porosity involved the determination of air flowthrough the fabric under a small pressure differential (0.5 inch waterpressure drop) and reportedly relates to the breathability of thefabric. Fabric samples were die-cut to 4 inch by 4 inch then mounted toexpose a test area of approximately 4.2 square inches and the air flowdetermined.

Wrinkle Resistance

After completion of the wash resistance tests, the samples were ratedindependently by three observers against the Monsanto Three DimensionalWash-N-Wear Standards. The values were averaged and recorded. Samplesdestroyed in the wash resistance tests were assigned a zero value. Inthis test higher values indicate fewer wrinkles.

The following examples further serve to illustrate the invention.

EXAMPLE 1

A seies of foamable formulations was prepared to illustrate theimportance of having all three components in the foamable mixture at therecited concentrations. Runs A and B are illustrative of this invention;Runs C, D and E contain one of the components in the foamable mixture ata concentration outside the range found desirable; in Run F all of thecomponents in the foamable mixture are present at concentrations outsidethe desired range.

    ______________________________________                 Run                 A    B      C      D    E    F    ______________________________________    Hydroxyethyl cellulose,                   2.71   2.35   2.32 2.33 2.44 2.08    phr    Filler, clay, phr                   45.24  39.26  38.76                                      38.85                                           40.79                                                34.68    Pigment, TiO.sub.2, phr                   30.16  26.17  25.84                                      25.90                                           27.19                                                23.12    Surfactant A, phr*                   13.20  6.54   1.61 11.34                                           11.90                                                1.45    Surfactant B, phr*                   6.60   3.27   5.66 0.81 3.40 0.72    Surfactant C, phr*                   9.43   4.67   8.08 1.16 1.22 1.04    Lecithin, phr  8.08   4.67   2.31 4.63 7.28 2.06    Latex polymer, (a)    (b)    (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)    100 parts dry    pH             3.5    3.5    4.5  4.5  4.5  3.5    Total solids, %                    40    40     40    40   40  40    Brookfield LVT viscosity,                   240    1112   2850 470  487  3000    cps    ______________________________________     *Surfactant A -- ethoxylated nonylphenol having an average of 100     ethyleneoxy groups.     *Surfactant B -- disodium N--octadecyl sulfosuccinamate.     *Surfactant C -- sodium hexadecyl sulfate.     (a) -- A 39.5 vinyl acetate/55.5 nbutyl acrylate/4 N--methylol     acrylamide/1 methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids     content of 48.8 weight percent and a pH of 4.4     (b) -- A 5.8 methyl methacrylate/79.2 ethyl acrylate/10 2ethylhexyl     acrylate/4 N--methylol acrylamide/1 methacrylic acid copolymer latex     having a total solids content of 49.6 weight percent and a pH of 4.4     (c) -- A 17 acrylonitrile/78 nbutyl acrylate/4 N--methylol acrylamide/1     methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids content of 49.5     weight percent and a pH of 4.4     (d) -- A 3 methyl methacrylate/92 ethyl acrylate/4 N--methylol     acrylamide/1 methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids     content of 49.4 weight percent and a pH of 4.1     (e) -- A 3.2 styrene/91.8 ethyl acrylate/4 N--methylol acrylamide/1     methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids content of 49.2     weight percent and a pH of 4.5     Note:     phr values are on dry, active basis based per 100 parts of dry polymer in     the latex formulation.

The pH of each was adjusted to the value indicated with a 10% aqueousoxalic acid solution and then each of the above formulations wasseparately foamed to a foam density of about 0.25 g/cc in a laboratorymixer. The foam was normalized, large bubbles of air stirred out of themixture, by a final slow stirring.

On a Teflon® sheet there was placed a polyester fabric (1.5 ounces persquare yard), stretched to remove all wrinkles, and a 30 mil coating ofthe froth was applied to the surface of the fabric. The surface of thefroth latex foam formulation was immediately sprayed with ground cottonlinters and then dried for 2 minutes at about 127° C., crushed betweentwo rubber rollers at a pressure of 50 psi, and finally cured at about150° C. for 3 minutes. A solid foam resulted. The foam fabrics producedhad the following properties:

    ______________________________________                 Run Fabric                 A    B      C      D    E    F    ______________________________________    Dry strength, pli                   2.23   2.24   2.59 2.86 2.78 3.18    Wet strength, pli                   1.20   1.39   1.55 1.64 1.60 2.19    Taber, cycles at failure                    40     30     16   168  142 198    Crockmeter, cycles    at failure     1000   177    1000 1000 1000 440    Wash resistance, cycles    at failure       1     1       1    5    1   3    Stiffness, mg(cm × 10.sup.-6)                   2.75   2.93   3.38 2.06 5.46 5.24    Porosity, cu ft air/    sq ft/min      19.8   19.8   19.7 21.8 19.8 19.4    Wrinkle resistance                   --      5      4.7   5    5   4    ______________________________________

Foam fabrics produced in similar manner omitting flocking show similarresults.

EXAMPLE 2

A formulation was prepared containing 2.5 phr hydroxyethyl cellulose,41.8 phr of clay filler, 27.87 phr of titanium dioxide, 12.2 phr ofSurfactant A, 3.48 phr of Surfactant B, 8.72 phr of Surfactant C, 2 phrof lecithin and 100 phr, dry basis, of the latex polymer identified infootnote (e) of Example 1. Surfactants A, B and C are also identified inthe footnotes of Example 1. The foamable composition was adjusted to apH of 4 as indicated in Example 1; it had a total solids content of 40weight percent and a Brookfield LVT viscosity of 460.

The foamable formulation was foamed, applied to polyester fabric andcured as described in Example 1. The foam fabric properties are shown inTable I.

EXAMPLE 3

Two foamable formulations were prepared using two different latexcompositions but differing mainly in the concentrations of filler andpigment added, using the concentrations of components indicated below:

    ______________________________________                        Run                        A    B    ______________________________________    Hydroxyethyl cellulose, phr                          1.01   1.03    Filler, clay, phr     16.87  51.70    Pigment, TiO.sub.2, phr                          8.31   25.46    Surfactant A, phr*    7.05   7.20    Surfactant B, phr*    3.52   3.60    Surfactant C, phr*    5.04   5.14    Lecithin              3.52   3.60    Latex polymer, 100 parts dry                          (f)    (g)    pH                    3.5    3.5    Total solids, %        35     45    Brookfield LVT viscosity, cps                          140    430    ______________________________________     *See footnotes Example 1     (f) -- A 15 styrene/80 ethyl acrylate/4 N--methylol acrylamide/1     methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids content of 49.7     weight percent and a pH of 4.3     (g) -- A 12 acrylonitrile/83 ethyl acrylate/4 N--methylol acrylamide/1     methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids content of 48.6     weight percent and a pH of 4.5

Each foamable formulation was adjusted to the pH indicated, foamed andapplied to polyester fabric as described in Example 1, dried at about113° C. for 3 minutes, crushed and cured at about 149° C. for 3 minutes.The foam fabrics produced were evaluated with the results shown in TableI.

EXAMPLE 4

The beneficial effect of initially grinding the filler and pigment isillustrated by this example. In both runs the foamable formulations usedare within the scope of the invention; however, in Run A, which includedthe grinding step, the overall properties of the finished foam fabricwere better.

The finished foamable formulations contained the following components:

    ______________________________________    Hydroxyethyl cellulose, phr                         2.05    Filler, clay, phr    34.17    Pigment, TiO.sub.2, phr                         22.78    Surfactant A, phr*   5.69    Surfactant B, phr*   2.85    Surfactant C, phr*   4.07    Lecithin, phr        0.77    Latex polymer, 100 parts dry                         (h)    Crosslinker, phr**   5.75    Surfactant D, phr*** 1.16    Total solids, %      45    pH (adjusted as in Ex. 1)                         3.5    ______________________________________     *See footnotes Example 1     **Tetramethylol glycoluril     ***Nonylphenol polyethylene glycol ether having an average of 4     ethyleneoxy units     (h) A 71.8 ethyl acrylate/20 nbutyl acrylate/4 acrylonitrile/2 N--methylo     acrylamide/2.2 methacrylic acid copolymer latex having a total solids     content of 55 weight percent

In run A the pigment and filler were given a preliminary grind by mixingtogether the following components:

    ______________________________________    Clay filler        441    parts by weight    Titanium dioxide   294    parts by weight    Surfactant A (70%) 7      parts by weight    Lecithin           10     parts by weight    Surfactant D       15     parts by weight    Water              409.8  parts by weight    ______________________________________

The mixture was ground for 20 minutes and a portion thereof was used toproduce the foamable formulation.

In Run B all of the components were mixed together as described in theprevious examples without grinding.

The two foamable compositions were foamed, applied and cured asdescribed in Example 1. The foam fabrics produced were evaluated and theresults are shown in Table I.

EXAMPLE 5

A foamable formulation was prepared in which the pigment and fillerunderwent a preliminary grind treatment with a portion of the disodiumN-octadecyl sulfosuccinamate and water before the other components wereadded; parts are by weight.

The grind was produced by adding 39 parts of clay filler, 26 parts oftitanium dioxide and 2.19 phr (3 parts of 35% solution) of disodiumN-octadecyl sulfosuccinamate to 32 parts of water and grinding for 20minutes.

A second mixture was prepared containing 87 parts of the same latexcopolymer described in Example 4, 3.16 phr (4.3 parts of 35% solution)of disodium N-octadecyl sulfosuccinamate, 4.24 phr (2.9 parts of 70%solution) of the same ethoxylated nonylphenol used in Example 1, and3.03 phr (5.8 parts of 25% solution) of sodium hexadecyl sulfate. Thismixture had a pH of 5.2.

The final foamable formulation was prepared by adding 65 parts of thesecond mixture, 8 parts of a 12% solution of hydroxyethyl cellulose to14 parts of the grind and mixing until uniform. The pH was adjusted to3.5 with a dilute (10%) oxalic acid solution, and then 2 parts oftetramethylol glycoluril and sufficient water that the entireformulation contained a total of 100 parts by weight were added.

The foamable composition was foamed, applied and cured as described inExample 1. Results are reported in Table I.

The following table summarizes the properties of the foam fabricsproduced in Examples 2 to 5 inclusive.

                  TABLE I    ______________________________________                 Example                 2    3         4         5                 Run                    A    B      A      B    5    ______________________________________    Dry strength, pli                   2.06   3.26   2.96 4.12  4.8 --    Wet strength, pli                   1.03   1.96   2.09 2.71 2.68 --    Taber, cycles at    failure         10    1000   1000 1000 41   1500    Crockmeter, cycles    at failure     1000   1000   1000  273 79   --    Wash resistance,    cycles at failure                     1      1      1    5   5     5    Stiffness, mg(cm × 10.sup.-6)                   1.89   2.41   3.26 4.85 3.44 --    Porosity, cu ft air/    sq ft/min      19.4   20.2   19.7  19  18.3 --    Wrinkle resistance                    4.2    5.0    4.5  4.8  4.9 --    ______________________________________

What is claimed is:
 1. A foamable composition having an acid pHcomprising a resin or latex formulation and a mixture for foaming saidresin or latex formulation which comprises a foamable mixture of:(a) 2to 20 parts of a highly ethoxylated alkylphenol of the formula: ##STR3##wherein R is a saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched alkyl havingfrom 7 to 20 carbon atoms and x has an average value of from 20 to 200;(b) 2 to 20 parts of an alkali metal N-alkyl sulfosuccinamate of theformula: ##STR4## wherein R' is a saturated or unsaturated, linear orbranched alkyl having from 16 to 24 carbon atoms and M is hydrogen or analkali metal atom with the proviso that at least one M group is analkali metal atom; and (c) 3 to 40 parts of an alkali metal alkylsulfate of the formula:

    R"OSO.sub.3 M'

wherein R" is a saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched alkylhaving from 7 to 24 carbon atoms and M' is an alkali metal atom;whereinsaid parts of components (a), (b) and (c) are parts per 100 parts byweight of dry resin (phr) present in said resin or latex formulation insaid foamable composition.
 2. The foamable composition claimed in claim1, wherein(i) component (a) is present at a concentration of from 2.25to 18.5 phr; (ii) component (b) is present at a concentration of from2.25 to 17 phr; and (iii) component (c) is present at a concentration offrom 4.5 to 32.5 phr.
 3. The foamable composition claimed in claim 1wherein(i) component (a) is present at a concentration of from 6 to 12.5phr; (ii) component (b) is present at a concentration of from 5.4 to 14phr; and (iii) component (c) is present at a concentration of from 12 to24 phr.
 4. The foamable composition claimed in claim 1, wherein R is alinear alkyl group having from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; R' is a linearalkyl group having from 18 to 20 carbon atoms; and R" is a linear alkylgroup having from 8 to 15 carbon atoms.
 5. The foamable compositionclaimed in claim 1, wherein x has an average value of from 40 to 100 andM is sodium or potassium.
 6. The foamable composition claimed in claim1, wherein component (a) is ethoxylated nonylphenol in which x has anaverage value of from 40 to
 100. 7. The foamable composition claimed inclaim 1, wherein component (b) is disodium N-octadecyl sulfosuccinamate.8. The foamable composition claimed in claim 1, wherein component (c) issodium hexadecyl sulfate.
 9. The foamable composition claimed in claim 1comprising ethoxylated nonylphenol in which x has an average value of40; disodium N-octadecyl sulfosuccinamate; and sodium hexadecyl sulfate.